|
Please take a moment...ITS IMPORTANT! We only have until May 13th to alert the Governor and the Cabinet to our concerns.
Click To Top of Page
Victory on the Beach

Galt Mile Contingent Addresses Governor and Cabinet
Pio Ieraci, Chairman of the Galt Mile Community Association’s Presidents Council, led a contingent of eight Galt Mile residents to Tallahassee in support of rescuing Fort Lauderdale’s disappearing beaches. As a result, the Broward County Shore Preservation Project finally received the long awaited green light from the Governor and the Florida Cabinet at the scheduled May 13th Cabinet meeting. Rose Guttman, Fern McBride, Kathleen Freismuth, Iris and Joe Anastasi, Ron Gresser, and Eric Peter Berkowitz met the Governor and the Cabinet wearing red tee shirts emblazoned with "Save Broward Beaches" in response to the unwarranted delays encountered by the project in Tallahassee.
Former Director Steve Somerville of the Broward County Department of Planning and Environmental Protection (DPEP) described to the Cabinet members the county's plan to safely replace sand on Broward beaches lost to tidal erosion, tropical storms, and hurricanes. The project is scheduled to address severely eroded beaches in segments according to the degree of shoreline shrinkage. Somerville assured Governor Bush that Hollywood Beach, the Segment III (3) portion of the project, would start receiving sand within six months to rebuild its devastated beach.
 | | Commissioner Jim Scott | Time was equally allocated to the proponents and opponents of the project to present their final arguments to Attorney General Charlie Crist, Chief Financial Officer Tom Gallagher, Commissioner of Agriculture Charles Bronson, and Governor Jeb Bush. The Cabinet Members, having been briefed by their aides who met with the concerned parties the previous week, strictly enforced the imposed time constraints. After Steve Somerville summarized the salient aspects of the County's intentions, Broward County Commissioner Jim Scott, Hollywood Representative Eleanor Sobel, and Fort Lauderdale City Commissioner Christine Teel all voiced strong support for the project’s implementation.
 | | Secretary David Struhs | Pio Ieraci, who also chairs the Broward Beach Coalition, hosted an effective presentation advocating the inclusion of the Fort Lauderdale, Segment II (2), renourishment into the overall project. After explaining the need to address Fort Lauderdale’s eroded beaches, Mr. Ieraci introduced highly respected environmentalist Roy Rogers to the Cabinet. Mr. Rogers has served as the Vice Chair of the Florida Audubon Society and Vice Chair of the Florida Community Trust. In addition, he Chairs the Nature Conservancy and is the Governor's appointee to the Environmental Regulation Committee. Rogers’ portrayal of the entire project as safe, well-planned, and absolutely necessary offset claims to the contrary by project opponents. Mr. Ieraci then directed the Governor’s attention to the red tee shirted Galt Mile residents standing in the audience and introduced Eric Berkowitz as their representative. Mr. Berkowitz alerted the Cabinet to the depth of the community’s concern about losing it’s beach. David B. Struhs, Secretary of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, exclaimed his appreciation to Mr. Berkowitz for the clear demonstration of support for the project by the Galt Mile residents.
Governor Bush and the Cabinet voted unanimously to approve, with certain conditions, Broward County’s permit request for the entire project. The Hollywood Segment would proceed immediately. This segment would be monitored for eighteen months to assure its anticipated outcome and use any data gathered from this oversight to refine the process as applied to the Fort Lauderdale segment. The next hurdle for County officials and concerned residents is to gain the required Federal support for the project.
Click To Top of Page
Federal Findings Favorable

A.C.E. Drafts Final Environmental Impact Statement
The US Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, has completed the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Segments II and III of the Broward County Shore Protection Project. The proposed Broward County Shore Protection Project involves placement of approximately 2.5 million cubic yards of material along 11.8 miles of Broward County’s coastline. The Statement confirms that “The proposed Broward County Shore Protection Project will be in the National interest and can be constructed while protecting the environment from unacceptable impacts.” In summarizing the project's rationale, the Statement further elaborates, “Federal and County objectives include:
- the reduction of expected storm damages through beach nourishment and other project alternatives;
- reestablishing beaches as suitable recreational areas;
- maintaining suitable beach habitat for nesting sea turtles, invertebrate species and shorebirds; and
- maintaining commerce associated with beach recreation in Broward County.”
This is good news for the millions of South Florida residents and visitors that consider the beach, which is in imminent danger of disappearing, to be an integral part of their lives.
 | | PORT EVERGLADES | A contingent of Galt Mile Residents attended a May 13th Florida Cabinet meeting (Item 19 on the Agenda) in a successful effort to include Fort Lauderdale in the permit required to advance the project. The Project was approved to be completed in to parts or "Segments". The Southern part, Segment III, extends from Port Everglades through John U. Lloyd State Park, Dania Beach, Hollywood (where the beaches are already gone) and Hallandale to the Broward County/Dade County line. Work on this segment is anticipated to start in June, 2004 and continue for six months to December. A Cabinet-mandated 18 month "observation period" to assess direct, secondary and long-term effects to nearshore hardbottom habitat associated with the proposed project will commence upon completion of Segment III.  | | HILLSBORO INLET | Based upon the monitoring of these areas in Segment III, DEP would determine the likelihood for adverse impacts to the similar areas in Segment II, and recommend possible modifications and/or conditions to avoid or minimize impacts. The Segment II (Hillsboro Inlet to Port Everglades) fill will be placed along beaches in southern Pompano Beach, Lauderdale-By-The-Sea, and northern Fort Lauderdale. Segment II should subsequently start in June of 2006.
The Final Environmental Impact Statement addresses all of the concerns expressed by an assortment of official environmental watchdog agencies in response to the original Draft Environmental Impact Statement drawn in March, 2002. The Project has garnered the support of The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), The Broward County Department of Planning and Environmental Protection (DPEP), The National Marine and Fisheries Service (NMFS), The Florida Audubon Society, The Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District Regulatory Division (ACE), The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), The Florida Communities Trust (FCT), The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and The Nature Conservancy.
|
| | Timeline |
 |
| |
| Projected Date | Project Progress |
| |
| June 2004 | Commence Segment III (Port Everglades to Broward/Dade County Line) |
| |
| December 2004 | Complete Segment III - 18 Month Monitoring Period starts |
| |
| June 2006 | 18 Month Monitoring Period ends - Commence Segment II (Hillsboro Inlet to Port Everglades) |

 | | Broward County Shore Protection Project Segments II & III Beach Fill Limits | The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Division of Recreation and Parks, and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) expressed concern regarding the negative impact of the construction of T-head groin upon sea turtle nesting success and hatchling behavior, and the potential public safety hazard to recreational beach users. Since initial consultation with the FDEP, the groin field at John U. Lloyd State Park was modified from eleven (11) T-head groins to three (3) groins: two T-head structures and one spur. Appropriate sea turtle protection measures will be implemented in Broward County to minimize impacts to sea turtle hatchlings. Of course, if the beaches are permitted to disappear, there will be NO NESTING HABITAT for sea turtles.
The FFWCC expressed concern that sand placement for the Broward County beach restoration project will result in the loss of nearshore hardbottom areas with dense coverage of marine macroalgae that has been identified as important foraging habitat for certain marine turtles. A mitigation monitoring plan has been developed and accepted by the FFWCC and FDEP that involves long-term monitoring of the mitigation reefs to determine the replacement habitat value compared to the natural nearshore hardbottom.
The National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS) expressed concern that several issues related to project siting, impact assessment, mitigation proposals and economic analysis were not adequately addressed in the original Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Extensive interagency coordination and additional field investigations were conducted to address the issues raised by the NMFS. The NMFS has withdrawn their opposition to the project contingent upon the construction of 11.9 acres of mitigation reef and extensive project monitoring.
Every environmental impact raised by every mainstream environmental group has been thoroughly addressed and scrupulously responded to in this Final Impact Statement. It clearly demonstrates the Broward County plan to be safe and effective. It includes a comprehensive Cumulative Effects Assessment, a Biological Monitoring Program, turbidity monitoring, a Habitat Equivalency Analysis and a complete Nearshore Hardbottom Mitigation Plan and Shoreline Impact Analysis along with a Broward County Nearshore Hardbottom Fish Study.
There are, however, a small number of radical fringe groups that wouldn't mind seeing our beaches melt quietly into the sea. Some of these groups have political motives behind their opposition to save the beaches. Others have financial concerns. Most of them do not live here. They have a history of making completely irrelevant and unrealistic demands on Project Coordinators, such as their insistence that florida beaches be completely rezoned prior to saving the beaches. Their stated intention is to delay and/or derail the widely supported effort to rescue Broward's eroding beaches.
The Army Corps of Engineers is currently in the process of finalizing the documents and permits that will allow Broward County to begin the renourishment of our beaches. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was first made available for public review on January 2, 2004. This review will be completed by February 2, 2004. During this month-long process, the Broward County community has the right to comment on the plan. Once the comments are all received, the Corps will issue a final Record of Decision.
This is your opportunity to be heard!

Write...Fax...Email by February 2, 2004 

Please exhibit your support for the plan to save our beaches. For more information and/or to demonstrate your support, contact Ms. Terri Jordan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Planning Division, P.O. Box 4970, Jacksonville, Florida 32232-0019, phone (904) 232-1817 or facsimile 232-3442. Ms. Jordan Can be reached by email at Terri.L.Jordan@usace.army.mil or by Clicking Here. Tell her that you support the Broward County Shore Protection Project to save our beach! Comments must be received within 30 days of publication of the Final Environmental Impact Statement in the Federal Register... That's February 2. Don't procrastinate...please act now as we are currently one hurricane away from the beach disappearing forever!
If you are pressed for time or can't find the words to express your concern, simply fill in your name and E-Mail address and press SEND in the form below. Your message will be sent to Ms. Terri Jordan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Planning Division. Please feel free to read the included text. To send a different message, use the E-Mail links above.
If you prefer, you can copy and paste the message below into your favorite email program!
Click To Top of Page
Final Record of Decision

A.C.E. Completes ROD! 
The US Army Corps of Engineers published its completed Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Broward County Shore Protection Project, Segments II and III, in the Federal Register on January 2, 2004. The 30-day statutory waiting period which affords the public an opportunity to offer comments on the FEIS ended on February 2nd. A compilation of the collected comments called the General Reevaluation Report (GRR) was generated and attached to the FEIS. Once these two documents were reviewed, the Corps issued a Record of Decision (ROD) that serves as the final verdict in judging the efficacy, viability and advisability of the target project.
 | | Brigadier General RANDAL R. CASTRO | On May 13th, we received notification from the Broward County Department of Planning and Environmental Protection that the Record of Decision had been arrived at in the form of a letter from Brigadier General Randal R. Castro, South Atlantic Division Commander of the Army Corps of Engineers. The ROD is divided into 6 sections. The actual “Decision” opens the document. It reads as follows:
“We have reviewed the General Reevaluation Report (GRR) and Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) on the Broward County Shore Protection Project, Segments II and III, Broward County, Florida. We have also reviewed all associated correspondence, including comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and the FEIS. Based upon this review and the views of interested agencies and the concerned public, I find that the plan recommended in the GRR and FEIS by the District Engineer, Jacksonville District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), is economically justified, technically feasible, in compliance with environmental statutes, and in the overall public interest.”
The second section of the ROD is entitled, “Project Authority and the Need for Proposed Action”. This section explains the underlying authority that the Record of Decision and its supporting documentation is predicated on. It defines the problem as, “The coastline of Broward County is low-lying and vulnerable to storm event damages. Shoreline recession continues to be a problem along Broward County Beaches. The purpose of the GRR and FEIS was to evaluate alternatives to address these challenges and to recommend a comprehensive, cost-effective, and environmentally acceptable solution.”
Part 3, the “Alternatives and Recommended Plan”, outlines the aspects of the project. It describes the National Economic Development Plan (NED) that was recommended by the Corps’ District Engineer and discusses several alternatives that were considered and declined. The NED covers 11.8 miles of the 24 miles of shoreline from Deerfield Beach through Hallandale and includes the following elements:
- Placement of 2.5 million cubic yards of material along 11.8 miles of Broward County's shoreline.
- Segment II (Hillsboro Inlet to Port Everglades), fill will be placed along beaches in Pompano Beach, Lauderdale-By-The-Sea and Fort Lauderdale.
- Segment III (Port Everglades to the south county line), fill will be placed along beaches in John U. Lloyd State Park, Dania Beach, Hollywood and Hallandale Beach.
- Fill will be obtained from five discrete offshore borrow areas located in the central and northern portion of the county.
- Development and implementation of an integrated pre- and post-construction monitoring plan was developed in close coordination with Federal and State resource agencies.
Approximately 2.5 million cubic yards of sand would be placed for the initial construction with a total of 5.4 million cubic yards of sand needed for the life of the project.
 | | Fort Lauderdale's Shrinking Ribbon of Beach | Three approaches were considered in the GRR and FEIS; “no action”, structural alternatives and non-structural alternatives. “No action” achieved none of the planning objectives. The non-structural alternatives, in addition to not being economically feasible, do not address the loss of land (the existing beach) caused by long-term erosion. The structural alternative described in the NED is fiscally viable and achieves every planning objective.
The fourth part is “Public Coordination”. The month long “comment” period from the publication of the “Notice of Availability” of the FEIS in the Federal Register on January 2nd elicited numerous responses from Federal, State and local government agencies, property owners, environmental organizations, and individual stakeholders. Because no new substantive issues were raised in the FEIS that weren’t previously addressed in the DEIS, the coordination with agencies and interest groups relating to project impacts and adjunctive mitigation was already adequately provided for.
Part 5 of the Record of Decision addresses the “Factors Considered to Minimize Adverse Impacts” that may or may not surface. The most significant area of concern identified during project formulation focuses on the specific measures to offset impacts to near shore reefs and hard bottom communities. The Corps incorporated the recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), other mainstream environmental agencies, various interest groups and members of the public into the plan. The State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has determined the project to be consistent with the existing Florida Coastal Management Program and, as such, issued a Joint Coastal Permit to Broward County on May 12, 2003 for both Segments II and III. To address Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) expressed a Biological Opinion designed to protect Turtles and Manatees. It produced measures that were incorporated into the plan and approved by USFWS on October 10, 2002, in the Final Coordination Act Report (CAR). Those species under the purview of the National Marine and Fisheries Service (NMFS) were provided for previously in a March 10, 2000 correspondence with the NMFS.
 | | EFFECTS OF SEVERE TIDAL EROSION WILL BE REVERSED | The 6th and final section of the ROD is a “Summary” that reads, “In view of the above, I find that the adverse impacts of the proposed action have been minimized, to the extent practicable, and the proposed action is consonant with national policy, statutes, and administrative directives. In consideration of all pertinent factors, the overall public interest will best be served by providing the improvements as described in the General Reevaluation Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Broward County Shore Protection Project.” The document is dated 11 May, 2004 and signed by “Randall R. Castro, Brigadier General, US Army, Commanding.”
That’s it - its official - the plan has the blessing of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, all of the environmental watchdogs with authoritative standing and the people that live on the beach. Broward County now carries the ball. They will implement the southern segment of the project first, monitor the effects for 18 months, and complete the northern portion when the southern portion receives a clean bill of health.
The remaining obstacles to the project’s ultimate implementation are two-fold. The vested interest lobby that has supported the disappearance of the beach is still working to bring this strange aspiration to fruition. The second, more ominous, threat emanates from the United States Congress. There is a movement afoot to withdraw support for environmental programs because of fiscal constraints. The Broward County Commission has sent a letter (Click Here to View Letter) to the relevant legislators requesting that they reject any attempt to withdraw support for salvaging the nation’s beaches. That aside, the legal underpinning for the fight to rescue our beach is in place and its renourishment is simply a matter of time!
Additional links to source information web sites:
Click To Top of Page
Delays and “Poison Pill” Bill Plague Beach Project

Broward Finally Secures Permit 
The Broward County Department of Planning & Environmental Protection (DPEP) spent 5 years addressing the concerns of legitimate environmental groups as a statutory precursor to renourishing our disappearing Broward County beaches. Stephen Higgins, the Beach Erosion Administrator for the DPEP’s Biological Resources Division and the county’s beach renourishment director, ascribed the extensive delays to the inordinate amount of attention given the project by Federal and State Authorities. Despite widespread acceptance of the project by every major environmental group owing to Mr. Higgins’ diligence in addressing virtually all of their concerns, certain fringe elements continue their commitment to derailing the project. They have a history of making completely irrelevant and unrealistic demands on Project Coordinators, such as their insistence that Florida beaches be completely rezoned prior to saving the beaches. By delaying the project through a continuous spate of frivolous demands, they can escalate the costs. “Somehow our project has gotten more scrutiny from agencies and activist groups than any project I’ve ever seen,” explained Mr. Higgins. Total project costs have almost doubled from $30 million to $59 million, in large part from unnecessary delays.
 | REPRESENTATIVE ELEANOR SOBEL | The latest delay resulted in the postponement of the July 1st start date for the restoration of the nearly non-existent Hollywood beaches. Angry residents and local officials are demanding an end to these capricious delays.  | ATTORNEY GENERAL CHARLIE CRIST | State Representative Eleanor Sobel (D-Hollywood), frustrated by the project’s plodding pace, asked Florida State Attorney General Charlie Crist to look into the legitimacy of the delays. He agreed, stating “It seems like it has been an issue for quite some time.” Joann Carrin, spokeswoman for Attorney General Crist, elaborated, “We’re just looking into the whole issue, and the delays; we’re going to see what's going on.” The underlying reasons for the beach renourishment are both safety-related and financial. Broward’s share of Florida’s $15 billion beach industry is $600 million. The beach also protects billions of dollars worth of property and tens of thousands of lives exposed to severe storm event damages. Stringing out the project leaves residents and property at risk, skyrockets the cost and undermines the tourism-driven local economy.
 | BRIGADIER GENERAL RANDAL R. CASTRO | On May 13th, exactly one year since Governor Bush and the Cabinet (including Attorney General Crist) voted unanimously to approve Broward County’s permit request for the entire project, we were notified by the Broward County Department of Planning and Environmental Protection that the Record of Decision (ROD) was received from Brigadier General Randal R. Castro, South Atlantic Division Commander of the Army Corps of Engineers.  | | COLONEL JAMES G. MAY | In the Record of Decision (ROD) - the formal endorsement of the project by the Corps as having complied with every statute and concern raised by legitimate environmental authorities - he states, “I find that the plan recommended in the GRR (General Reevaluation Report) and FEIS (Final Environmental Impact Statement) by the District Engineer, Jacksonville District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), is economically justified, technically feasible, in compliance with environmental statutes, and in the overall public interest.” The Corps also asked that 52 additional concerns be addressed. They were.
This heightened focus on project delays seems to have been just what the doctor ordered; the final permit to proceed was received by the DPEP on July 19th. Once the permit is executed by Broward County and Colonel James G. May, the Commander and District Engineer of the Corps’ Jacksonville District, the County can begin the bidding process for contractors, hopefully providing for a November project start date.
Booby Trapped Beach Bill 
A serious problem has surfaced in the United States Senate. It appears that we may have to repeat the entire approval process... from scratch. The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee buried a “poison pill” into a bill labeled the “Water Resources Development Act” (WRDA), S.2554. Section 3301 mandates a rewrite of the Army Corps of Engineers policy and guidance that imposes another bureaucratic layer of restrictions on beach nourishment. Without any public testimony or hearings on the issue, a proposed “Beach Nourishment Advisory Committee” would be created to oversee beach projects. This new committee would create an additional layer of reviews and regulations, adding to the time and cost of each and every project. Beach projects are the ONLY projects specifically targeted in the bill for this type of micro-management by the federal government. Incomprehensibly, the language used in the legislation was submitted by an organization that is fanatically opposed to beach nourishment.
 | | SENATE ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE | The “Beach Nourishment Advisory Committee” would enforce 10 specific revisions to the planning requirements imposed on the Army Corps of Engineers… only with regard to beach projects. Since every requirement is already enumerated in existing legislation, the need for another repetitive layer of governmental regulation is unclear. In addition, the committee will attempt to apply a standardized one-size-fits-all approach to many site- or state- specific conditions. For instance, Requirement #4 states that the Committee shall, “establish standards that ensure that sand deposited on replenished beaches features compatible grain size, shell content, and other geological characteristics of a natural beach”. Since every beach is different, the committee’s ultimate determination of what constitutes the generically correct grain size and shell content of a “natural beach” will be virtually useless. Site-specific considerations determine what sand characteristics are “compatible” from engineering and environmental perspectives. That decision needs to be made locally, on a beach by beach basis. This attempt to generalize standards (make the foot fit the shoe) is thematic in this legislation.
The American Shore and Beach Preservation Association (ASBPA), a longtime advocate of the nation’s beaches, has created a Position Paper on the proposed Beach Nourishment Advisory Committee that details the rationale for opposing its enactment. Most responsible beach communities would welcome a revision of the Corps’ policies and procedures in order to
- streamline the project planning process;
- reduce unnecessary planning costs;
- promote regional and/or programmatic planning where appropriate; and
- assure that any short- and long-term environmental impacts of beach nourishment projects are benign.
The “poison pill” that was unceremoniously dumped into the Senate’s WRDA bill, however, accomplishes NONE of these objectives.
Positioned in Senate Bill S.2554 under Title III—Flood and Coastal Storm Damage Reduction, Subtitle B--Coastal Storm Damage Reduction, Section 3301—Shore Protection and Beach Renourishment Projects, the section’s specific provisions are drawn from anecdotal “evidence” which ignores that the Corps already addresses each of the concerns raised in this provision. Without any public testimony, discussion, or any evidence of need, the legislation establishes an advisory committee that will not advise, but rather enforce the redundant requirements in 10 specific areas that are already addressed in existing legislation. In addition to lacking a provision to finance the costs of this committee (another visit to Unfunded Mandate-ville), the decisions of the advisory committee would apply to all existing draft feasibility studies and draft re-evaluation reports that have not yet been issued. This means that studies that have been produced under one set of procedures over a period of several years will have to be redone with the revised regulations, guidelines, and circulars. This retroactive application could effectively double feasibility costs and timetables for all existing projects. Nothing in the provision requires that advisory committee members have water resources planning expertise, nor does the provision include a representative of the Corps of Engineers. Should the unamended legislation be enacted, the cost of beach projects would increase substantially as will their impending timetables due to the responsible lead agencies having to slug their way through another unnecessary layer of redundant governmental regulations.
Please Take a Moment to Avoid a Nightmare
 | | Senator Bob Graham |  | | Senator William Nelson | The overt inadequacies and the surprise addition of this unsupported provision becloud the intentions of the Senators that allowed its inclusion. Motives aside, the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association (ASBPA) and the Florida Shore & Beach Preservation Association (FSBPA) strongly advocate that the establishment of a beach nourishment advisory committee is NOT the appropriate tactic to resolve concerns with the existing process and urge that it be removed from the bill prior to Senate passage.
The Galt Mile Community Association agrees and asks each of its members to contact their Senators and urge the removal of this section from the bill. The idea of re-experiencing the past 5 years of scrupulously performed feasibility studies to accommodate a suspicious and poorly conceived legislative midnight surprise passes from the ridiculous to the sublime. Please contact Senators Graham and Nelson by email and telephone to let them know that the WRDA bill must be improved through the removal of Section 3301 (Click and Scroll Down to 3301). (Senator Graham, incidentally, is a member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.) As conscientious Florida officials, they are keenly aware of the importance of maintaining the beaches that underwrite our economy. If they receive a reasonable indication of our concerns, they will fight to excise this “Poison Pill”.
- Click Here to send an email to Senator Graham. Please follow-up with a phone call to Graham’s office: Bob Dobek with Senator Graham (202) 224-3041 - Local Tel # is: (305) 536-7293.
- Click Here to send an email to Senator Nelson. Please follow-up with a phone call to Nelson’s office: (202) 224-5274 - Local Tel # is: (305) 536-5999, 1 (888) 671-4091.
The Easy Way 
If you don't have the time or inclination to compose an email, you can send one that has already been composed for this purpose! Using this contact will send emails to Senator Graham and Senator Nelson with one click.
- Simply Click Here if you live on the Galt Mile (in the 33308 ZIP code).
- If you live anywhere else, please Click Here, then enter your ZIP code and click.
The American Shore and Beach Preservation Association (ASBPA) has developed a Position Paper that clearly addresses the issues at stake. To read the text of the “Poison Pill”, along with detailed explanations refuting the efficacy of each provision, Click Here.
To read the text of the “Poison Pill”, Click Here. (Scroll down to Section 3301 and click!)
Click To Top of Page
Where’s the Beach 

Hurricane Frances Carries a Warning
 | | Mayor Giulianti | Hollywood Mayor Mara Giulianti, comporting herself as a sensitively empathetic municipal guardian during a real life natural disaster, responded succinctly to her interviewer from channel 10, “Well, the situation is extremely dangerous because there is no beach to buffer us from the effects of the storm.” POINT TAKEN! Hurricane Frances was skirting its North Palm Beach landfall at about 4:30 PM Saturday afternoon as her live interview hit the air. The cameras caught sections of Surf Road just south of Dania Boulevard actually dissolving during the Mayor’s evaluation of the damages suffered along the vulnerable beach. The beaches in Hollywood disappeared several years ago, the victim of sustained tidal erosion. The condition is mirrored up and down the East Coast of Broward, as 21 of the 24 miles of the County’s beaches are critically eroded. In 1999, Broward County put the recovery process into motion, hoping to repair the deteriorating shoreline within the two - three year window that a safe, responsible beach renourishment would normally take. Every major environmental agency and organization took the opportunity to institute extensive protective measures and exigent monitoring requirements as the Broward County Department of Planning and Environmental Protection (DPEP), Biological Resources Division carefully steered the plan through its statutory paces in an effort to rescue the beach.
 |
|